Loading…
Lithuania · Autonomous System
The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 1 upstream providers, 0 peers and 1 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
exchange traffic directly
None recorded.
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, Türkiye).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
29 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
64.137.124.0/2464.137.103.0/2464.137.88.0/24104.239.86.0/242a12:f180::/2945.141.80.0/22209.35.113.0/2464.137.91.0/24216.173.84.0/2464.137.104.0/2464.137.112.0/24209.35.4.0/23216.173.103.0/2464.137.108.0/24138.128.145.0/24207.244.216.0/2264.137.106.0/2464.137.17.0/2464.137.66.0/2464.137.38.0/24104.143.229.0/24193.148.92.0/23216.173.109.0/242a02:e9c5::/3264.137.118.0/2443.245.116.0/23160.19.92.0/2364.137.86.0/24104.239.108.0/24