Loading…
Hong Kong SAR China · Autonomous System
Where this network meets others — public exchange points, colocation facilities, and declared peering capacity.
The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 6 upstream providers, 0 peers and 6 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
give this network transit
exchange traffic directly
None recorded.
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, Japan).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
26 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
154.91.33.0/24103.50.255.0/24103.80.30.0/2445.192.173.0/2445.192.184.0/2445.192.183.0/24103.80.29.0/24103.50.254.0/2445.192.174.0/24116.89.243.0/24103.80.31.0/242404:de80:400::/39154.91.32.0/24156.236.117.0/24103.80.28.0/24116.89.240.0/2443.231.185.0/2445.192.176.0/24154.91.34.0/2445.192.188.0/24103.117.72.0/2445.192.177.0/24116.89.242.0/2445.192.162.0/24116.89.241.0/24154.209.2.0/24