Loading…
The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 2 upstream providers, 1 peers and 0 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
give this network transit
buy transit from it
None recorded.
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, Bangladesh).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
19 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
202.125.79.0/24202.125.66.0/24180.94.20.0/242401:51e0::/32103.135.235.0/24103.52.140.0/24103.52.141.0/24202.125.64.0/24103.142.69.0/24103.178.221.0/24202.125.68.0/24202.125.67.0/24103.10.195.0/24103.72.198.0/24103.135.234.0/24103.10.194.0/24103.52.143.0/24180.94.21.0/24180.94.20.0/23