Loading…
The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 4 upstream providers, 1 peers and 2 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
give this network transit
buy transit from it
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, Indonesia).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
25 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
202.155.90.0/24163.61.58.0/24202.155.18.0/24202.155.94.0/24202.155.14.0/2436.50.77.0/24160.19.167.0/24103.191.63.0/24160.19.166.0/24202.155.91.0/24157.15.124.0/24157.15.125.0/24103.147.154.0/24202.155.137.0/24202.155.157.0/24202.155.19.0/24103.169.206.0/24202.155.95.0/24103.169.207.0/24103.126.226.0/24103.143.12.0/24103.67.244.0/24202.155.132.0/242001:df7:5300::/48202.134.242.0/24