Loading…
Hong Kong SAR China · Autonomous System
Where this network meets others — public exchange points, colocation facilities, and declared peering capacity.
The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 1 upstream providers, 0 peers and 0 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
exchange traffic directly
None recorded.
buy transit from it
None recorded.
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, United States).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
22 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
154.206.128.0/18156.254.64.0/19156.254.32.0/19156.227.64.0/18154.194.128.0/1845.204.160.0/20156.249.224.0/20154.214.64.0/18154.199.32.0/20154.83.224.0/20154.89.224.0/20107.151.212.0/24156.253.144.0/20156.254.46.0/24204.77.130.0/2445.204.224.0/20156.254.34.0/24156.254.37.0/24154.82.32.0/19156.253.32.0/20154.215.64.0/18154.209.160.0/19