Loading…
The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 6 upstream providers, 15 peers and 5 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
give this network transit
exchange traffic directly
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, Hong Kong SAR China).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
27 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
161.129.42.0/24103.200.112.0/242401:d9c0:2000::/442a0f:7802:f000::/44182.255.32.0/24199.15.78.0/24124.108.20.0/24185.188.5.0/24199.15.76.0/23199.15.78.0/23182.255.32.0/22182.255.33.0/242400:cca0:2101::/48182.255.35.0/24199.15.79.0/24199.15.77.0/242604:d6c0::/48103.55.5.0/24103.169.217.0/242604:d6c0::/322401:d9c0:2010::/44103.200.112.0/232401:d9c0:2000::/36161.129.46.0/24199.15.76.0/24124.108.20.0/23103.200.113.0/24