The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 2 upstream providers, 2 peers and 1 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
give this network transit
exchange traffic directly
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, Hong Kong SAR China).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
30 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
156.254.20.0/24156.254.21.0/2466.212.58.0/23104.253.124.0/24172.252.224.0/24156.254.20.0/23163.223.146.0/24103.133.136.0/23172.252.224.0/23103.228.64.0/24154.193.211.0/24163.223.146.0/2343.229.152.0/23103.133.136.0/24172.252.172.0/2366.212.58.0/24154.193.247.0/2443.229.153.0/24154.89.194.0/24103.133.137.0/2466.212.59.0/2466.212.56.0/24172.252.172.0/24172.252.225.0/2466.212.57.0/24103.228.64.0/23163.223.147.0/24104.253.124.0/23172.252.173.0/24104.253.125.0/24