Loading…
Hong Kong SAR China · Autonomous System
The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 1 upstream providers, 0 peers and 0 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
exchange traffic directly
None recorded.
buy transit from it
None recorded.
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
20 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
61.18.139.0/24203.12.255.0/2469.33.212.0/2461.18.136.0/2445.202.199.0/2469.33.212.0/2369.33.210.0/2369.33.210.0/2461.18.142.0/2461.18.138.0/2461.18.143.0/2461.18.141.0/2461.18.137.0/2461.18.140.0/24203.12.254.0/2361.18.136.0/2169.33.213.0/2469.33.211.0/24203.12.254.0/24157.254.191.0/24