Loading…
The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 1 upstream providers, 0 peers and 0 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
exchange traffic directly
None recorded.
buy transit from it
None recorded.
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, Hong Kong SAR China).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
29 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
186.244.225.0/24186.244.232.0/24154.193.240.0/22186.244.239.0/24154.89.151.0/24186.244.234.0/24154.89.157.0/24186.244.238.0/24186.244.233.0/24186.244.229.0/2438.12.37.0/2438.12.38.0/24186.244.235.0/24156.254.5.0/24186.244.231.0/2438.55.254.0/24186.244.230.0/24186.244.227.0/24154.193.244.0/22186.244.237.0/24186.244.228.0/2438.55.252.0/2338.12.39.0/24186.244.224.0/24186.244.226.0/24186.244.236.0/2438.12.35.0/24154.89.152.0/24154.89.153.0/24