Loading…
The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 1 upstream providers, 0 peers and 0 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
exchange traffic directly
None recorded.
buy transit from it
None recorded.
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, Germany).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
26 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
194.88.232.0/24217.60.27.0/2445.153.33.0/24176.65.135.0/24195.254.165.0/2445.135.192.0/2446.38.152.0/24194.33.124.0/24194.120.230.0/24194.120.171.0/2487.229.56.0/2491.245.220.0/24103.161.34.0/23176.65.131.0/24147.79.0.0/24176.65.136.0/2491.199.14.0/24143.14.65.0/24185.3.200.0/24176.65.138.0/242a10:ca80::/4892.246.87.0/24176.65.128.0/2464.89.162.0/2445.87.248.0/24195.62.32.0/24