Loading…
The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 1 upstream providers, 0 peers and 0 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
exchange traffic directly
None recorded.
buy transit from it
None recorded.
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, Germany).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
22 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
159.195.12.0/22152.53.164.0/22152.53.80.0/22159.195.92.0/22152.53.88.0/22152.53.208.0/202a0a:4cc0:120::/43152.53.192.0/22152.53.201.0/242a0a:4cc0:2000::/43152.53.208.0/22159.195.16.0/22152.53.52.0/22152.53.212.0/24152.53.36.0/22159.195.91.0/24152.53.240.0/22152.53.68.0/242a0a:4cc0:101::/48152.53.31.0/24152.53.168.0/22159.195.107.0/24