Loading…
The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 1 upstream providers, 0 peers and 0 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
exchange traffic directly
None recorded.
buy transit from it
None recorded.
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, France).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
24 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
72.244.79.0/2440.27.219.0/2464.204.216.0/2472.244.58.0/24141.11.235.0/2472.244.74.0/24151.246.5.0/2472.244.64.0/2493.92.18.0/2491.238.92.0/2440.27.114.0/2474.1.46.0/2440.27.134.0/24143.20.148.0/2472.244.67.0/2489.116.45.0/2440.27.127.0/24216.75.147.0/24179.61.204.0/24151.241.23.0/24178.94.208.0/24195.72.168.0/24188.220.139.0/2464.226.205.0/24