Loading…
The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 1 upstream providers, 0 peers and 0 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
exchange traffic directly
None recorded.
buy transit from it
None recorded.
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, Taiwan).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
24 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
103.123.134.0/23211.76.186.0/23103.123.135.0/24103.123.134.0/24187.79.192.0/23211.76.187.0/24202.153.5.0/24163.128.192.0/24187.79.192.0/19202.148.220.0/23187.79.192.0/24103.177.33.0/24202.148.220.0/24161.248.145.0/24202.153.4.0/23103.227.227.0/24202.153.4.0/24163.128.192.0/23187.79.193.0/24103.227.226.0/23211.76.186.0/24161.248.144.0/23202.148.221.0/24103.177.32.0/23