Loading…
The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 1 upstream providers, 0 peers and 0 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
exchange traffic directly
None recorded.
buy transit from it
None recorded.
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, Australia).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
23 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
169.128.24.0/2245.121.97.0/24203.55.124.0/22142.249.176.0/22169.128.92.0/22169.128.72.0/2245.121.99.0/24169.128.236.0/2231.133.84.0/2223.246.188.0/2274.118.224.0/2245.121.98.0/24155.103.168.0/2245.121.96.0/24142.248.144.0/22200.229.17.0/24142.248.84.0/22142.249.232.0/22142.249.12.0/22103.31.210.0/24169.128.0.0/22216.24.222.0/24155.103.244.0/22