The network's position in the inter-domain routing hierarchy: its customer cone, connectivity, and transit role.
Inferred AS-level relationships: 2 upstream providers, 8 peers and 4 downstream customers. The graph shows the largest few of each; the lists link through.
give this network transit
exchange traffic directly
buy transit from it
Relationships are inferred from BGP by CAIDA and refreshed monthly. Transit links are well captured; some private and IXP peering is under-observed, so peer counts are a lower bound.
How well this network secures and documents its BGP announcements — RPKI origin validation, IRR registration, and an overall hygiene score.
Measured share of this network's users reaching the Internet over IPv6 (APNIC end-user measurement, Hong Kong SAR China).
Has working IPv6 connectivity, even if it isn't always chosen.
IPv6 wins when a destination is dual-stacked — the real-world usage rate.
Currently announced prefixes, live from RIPEstat.
Invalid announcements have a ROA on file but the origin AS or prefix length doesn't match it — usually a stale ROA or misconfiguration rather than an active hijack.
46 prefixes currently seen by RIPEstat.
45.90.208.0/2445.90.209.0/2445.141.44.0/24103.125.232.0/242403:2c80:aaaa::/48172.93.188.0/2445.141.47.0/2445.125.3.0/2445.90.211.0/2445.125.0.0/2445.125.1.0/2445.141.45.0/242403:2c80::/3295.214.164.0/242403:2c81:1110::/48149.62.47.0/2445.141.46.0/2445.125.2.0/242403:2c80:6::/48185.207.153.0/24103.125.233.0/242403:2c80:7::/48103.56.54.0/24172.93.165.0/24194.36.243.0/24157.119.100.0/242403:2c81::/322403:2c80:17::/4845.142.124.0/24103.56.52.0/242403:2c80:5::/48103.192.225.0/24203.25.119.0/24194.50.18.0/24149.62.46.0/24157.119.103.0/2495.214.165.0/24103.192.224.0/2445.128.220.0/24103.193.131.0/2445.90.210.0/24103.192.227.0/242403:2c80::/48157.119.102.0/24172.93.189.0/242403:2c80:3::/48